11 £3,493.26

Blog

𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐲 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐢𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧: 𝐍𝐨 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐠𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 ‘𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐚𝐱 𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐨𝐫’ 𝐬𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐇𝐌𝐑𝐂?

Nadhim Zahawi has not made an “innocent error” in his tax affairs, the head of HM Revenue and Customs suggested, raising fresh questions about the cabinet minister’s £1m fine.

The Tory chair claimed he had “acted properly” with his tax affairs and that officials had judged his error to have been “careless and not deliberate”.

“If you take reasonable care but nevertheless make a mistake, whilst you will be liable for the tax and for interest … you would not be liable for a penalty,” Mr Harra told the public accounts select committee on Thursday.

“But if your error was as a result of carelessness then legislation says a penalty can apply in those circumstances,” he added, stressing that he was not talking about Mr Zahawi’s specific case.

Labour’s deputy leader Angela Rayner said: “Nadhim Zahawi’s excuses are continuing to unravel.”

The prime minister is said to be “livid” at Mr Zahawi over the controversy, and a growing number of Tory MPs and peers are keen for Mr Zahawi to resign now – rather than wait for the outcome of the No 10 ethics investigation.

Saying his position was “untenable” without a clear explanation, Mr Mills added: “HMRC thought he did something they really didn’t like. Penalties are serious, though there are degrees of seriousness. It comes down to him to explain it and clarify all this.”

Ex-Tory chancellor Philip Hammond also criticised Mr Zahawi, saying he would not have accepted the job of chancellor in the summer if he had been involved in a “live” HMRC investigation – first revealed by The Independent in July.

He told LBC: “I think somebody needs to take Rishi Sunak to one side and say, look, you’re trying to protect him, we sort of understand that. But be in no doubt that you are taking on a huge amount of damage with every minute that you keep him in that post.”

Mr Zahawi has given HMRC his approval to speak to the investigation into his tax affairs, a source close to the Tory chair later said.

Trade minister Andrew Bowie – a close Sunak ally – had told the BBC that if Mr Zahawi is found to have “fallen foul” by the ethics adviser, the PM will “of course sack him”. A No 10 spokesperson said on Thursday that Mr Bowie had been “giving his opinion” rather than speaking for the PM.

Asked about the HMRC chief’s remarks, Mr Sunak said he would “await the findings” of the ethics probe.

Speaking at Chequers where he has been holding a cabinet awayday – where he was joined by the Mr Zahawi – Mr Sunak again insisted that the senior Tory’s tax affairs were not raised with him when he appointed him in October.

However, one source told The Guardian that No 10 was informed of Mr Zahawi’s penalty and tax settlement with HMRC prior to his appointment as Tory chair. Downing Street denied that this was the case.

 

𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐋𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐨𝐧 𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐥𝐞 𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞.

Non-profit Environmental Impact CDP bases its A-rating on actions such as transparency in climate change response, completion of climate risk and vulnerability assessments, publishing of a climate action plan, and setting science-based climate targets.

The announcement comes as new borough-wide proposals outline how Wandsworth residents will collaborate to reduce carbon emissions and improve air quality.

In response to public pressure, the council has agreed to set a target of becoming a net-zero borough by 2043.

Successfully bid for £3.5 million from the Public Sector Decarbonisation Scheme to upgrade council buildings. LED lighting, building fabric upgrades, and solar PV will be installed in five recreation centers, five children’s centers, and six schools.

Improved energy efficiency and lower carbon emissions in council housing. It is investing in communal heating in new buildings and collaborating with residents to reduce energy consumption and bills.

It is also bidding for funds from the Social Housing Decarbonisation Fund for energy-efficiency measures such as insulation, double glazing, thermostatic controls, and other measures.

 

 

Collaboration with schools was essential. Energy audits were performed at all schools to assess energy efficiency. The council will work with schools to improve building conditions and has established a Climate Change Network to provide additional assistance.

The Wandsworth Sustainability Partnership, which will be launched later this month, will bring together the public and private sectors, as well as voluntary organizations and community groups, to share best practices and collaborate to address the climate crisis.

Communications and engagement programs will also be expanded to reach more people, including efforts to assist people in managing the Cost of Living Crisis by reducing fuel consumption.

The council pension fund has been decarbonized. Renewable funds will receive up to £80 million in investment.

-Consented to the goal of having a net-zero borough by 2043.
bid effectively on £3.5 from the public sector.
-In council dwellings, there has been an improvement in energy efficiency and a decrease in carbon emissions.
-Collaborated closely with schools.
-Received input from the locals.
-The council pension fund has been decarbonized.

“There is no denying the severity of the situation; thus, we must move faster and remain vigilant. The council will take all necessary steps to clean house and will function as a catalyst to engage the rest of the neighborhood in a genuine partnership that produces common objectives and moves toward achieving net zero by 2043.

 

𝐖𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐬: 𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲

It’s necessary to find out who is funding our politicians and to inquire as to why because without greater transparency, money runs the risk of inadvertently affecting our politics.

During this Parliament, wealthy individuals or corporations have donated more than £183 million to the British political system, directly into the bank accounts of political parties, all-party parliamentary groups, and the campaign funds and electoral districts of government ministers and MPs from all political parties.

Even though the UK is one of the least corrupt countries in the world, comprehension has been hampered for far too long by the way information about MPs’ outside income and who is ultimately supporting our politics is revealed.

Despite all the assurances of openness, it has been quite challenging to understand what is happening.

Records of financial transactions involving donors, corporations, and politicians are dispersed across numerous websites, platforms, registers, disclosures, and databases—some online, some in print—and frequently published in formats that make it difficult to compare or analyze them.

This dispersion may be by design or by accident.

𝐒𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐌𝐏 𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐖𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐭𝐨𝐨𝐥

The chaos is deceptive; it hides things. Due to its seeming acceptance within Westminster over a long period of time, lobbying activities, paid access, and influence-peddling are harder to locate, trace, and more easily obscure than they should be.

 


𝐖𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐞𝐫
Checking who is supporting and paying your MP as a voter shouldn’t be difficult or open to misunderstanding.

Money talks, and finding out who has any kind of financial connection to our leaders should be quick and easy.

Together with Tortoise Media, Sky News has created a searchable, interactive web tool to examine who is profiting from the UK political system’s money flow.

The Westminster Accounts will be publicly available to everyone via a website and app, and it offers new options for everyone to search by an MP’s name or a voter’s postcode, which are presently not feasible using Parliament’s own platforms.

Whose earnings during this Parliament have been the highest? Which funders support both parties and individual MPs? which businesses and individuals have contributed the most, and which MPs have benefited.

Greater transparency is urgently required. Westminster has recently felt bogged down in an endless discussion over lobbying and the impact of outside income.

The biggest individual donations to MPs across all political parties are now known to us by name.

For the remainder of this Parliament, we are dedicated to preserving and enhancing the Westminster Accounts.

 

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐍 (𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞)𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐚𝐭𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞.

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, through paragraph 31 “calls for the widest possible international cooperation aimed at accelerating the reduction of global greenhouse gas emissions and addressing adaptation to the adverse impacts of climate change”.

Prior to the 2030 Agenda and the Future We Want, paragraph 38 under Chapter IV- “Protecting and managing the natural resource base of economic and social development” of the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation expresses the concern of Member States for the changes occurred in the Earth’s climate and the adverse effects that these changes have on humankind.

 

 

The Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) fourth session in 1996 held substantive discussions on protection of the atmosphere. CSD fourteenth session in 2006 and fifteenth session in 2007 focused on a cluster of thematic issues, including atmosphere and air pollution.

Protection of the atmosphere is a broad and multidimensional endeavour involving various sectors of economic activity.

Many of the issues discussed in Chapter 9 of Agenda 21, on “Protection of the Atmosphere,” are also addressed in such international agreements as the 1985 Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer, the 1987 Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer as amended, the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and other international, including regional, instruments.

Agenda 21 notes, however, that activities that may be undertaken in pursuit of the objectives of this chapter should be co-ordinated with social and economic development in an integrated manner with a view to avoiding adverse impacts on the latter, taking into full account the legitimate priority needs of developing countries for the achievement of sustained economic growth and the eradication of poverty.